ZannahM
Registered
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2021
- Messages
- 14
As integrative, holistic and homeopathic veterinarians, how do you (Dr. Christina, Dr. Jeff, Dr. Jean and others) respond to a conventional vet who argues that dog food should be from a few big companies like Purina because they supposedly are the only ones doing research and third party testing or whatever their party line is? What is at the root of their mistaken belief other than lobbying and money? I'm trying to understand their point of view so I can best debate in a constructive way.
Or the vets who say monthly neurotoxins are good prevention for fleas, tick and mosquitoes because Nexgard & Heartgard are supposedly the lesser of two evils as a general rule? I agree prevention is better than treatment, but not that way – not anymore. I’d love to hear your replies to such vets, especially about Purina and Royal Canin being the end-all-be-all. Thanks.
Or the vets who say monthly neurotoxins are good prevention for fleas, tick and mosquitoes because Nexgard & Heartgard are supposedly the lesser of two evils as a general rule? I agree prevention is better than treatment, but not that way – not anymore. I’d love to hear your replies to such vets, especially about Purina and Royal Canin being the end-all-be-all. Thanks.